Det finns inga prinsessor mer

About Laleh’s new album. English summary below.

Nu har jag lyssnat på Lalehs nya skiva Prinsessor och tänker leka musikrecensent. Efter en fantastisk första skiva hade jag stora förhoppningar på Prinsessor. Jag kan inte säga att besviken, men tycker ändå inte att den är lika stark som den första skivan. Överlag är den mindre sprallig, med fler lugna låtar. En mer pretentiös recensent skulle kanske säga att den här skivan är mer mogen, men jag uppskattade verkligen spretigheten på den första och tycker inte att det är en förbättring. Detta till trots är det en bra skiva och jag ska säga något om höjdpunkterna.

November. Den här låten känns positiv trots att texten handlar om människor som är elaka mot varandra. Musikaliskt är det också den låt jag gillar bäst.

Prinsessor. Pianoslingan påminner mig om en gammal spökfilm. “Det finns inga prinsessor mer, kan vi inte sluta leka det? Det finns inga soldater mer, kan vi inte sluta leka det?” Jag vet inte riktigt vad den här låten vill säga… jag vill gärna tolka det som “avskaffa monarkin och försvaret”, men det är nog inte hela sanningen. Kanske är det bristen på tydligt politiska låtar (i stil med Bostadsansökan) som får mig att vilja tolka in mer än vad som finns.

I Know This. Jag gillar både texten och musiken. “Let’s see how society would work without the people go to work.” Först trodde jag att texten ironiserade över naivt idealistiska människor, men Laleh känns inte så ironisk. Den avslutas med “I change my mind daily” så den ska nog inte ses som ett manifest.

Andra bra låtar är “Det är vi som bestämmer”, “Call on Me” och “Step on You”. Sammanfattningsvis gillar jag Lalehs nya skiva, men den är inte perfekt.


Laleh’s new album Prinsessor (princesses) is really good, but not as good as the first one. About half the songs are in English, of which I especially recommend November, I Know This and Step on You.

Hoping for the worst

I just learned that The Pirate Bay and Piratbyrån were raided today. I don’t know much about what’s happened, but I really do hope that things have been handled very poorly. I hope that the allegations made by SVT that this was triggered by pressure from America are true and that it will cause public outrage. If Thomas Bodström is somehow involved (unlikely perhaps), that would be absolutely superb too.

Why do I hope for the worst? Because I want this to become a topic of fierce political debate so that it will be very clear who is a friend and who is an enemy in the upcoming Swedish election. It’s been clear for a long time that none of the big parties are friends, but perhaps this will force some of them to make sensible decisions and become more friendly (look at what’s happening in France, it’s not impossible). I don’t know if the recently formed Pirate Party are sane, but hopefully they’ll be given a chance to present their views in the debate that will now follow.

The last time there was some debate about copyrights (when Sweden changed the copyright legislation to conform with EUCD last summer) I discussed and thought about these issues quite a bit. I arrived at the conclusion that copyright probably shouldn’t be abolished all together, but that some of the following might be good ideas.

  • Shorten the copyright term to something between 5 and 20 years.
  • Allow all non-commercial distribution use of works covered by copyright. If the copyright term is very short, this may not actually be necessary. Conversely, with a long term it might be useful to allow even more non-commercial uses (e.g. sampling music or re-editing bad movies).
  • Disallow distribution of works which have not been published. The idea is that a creator should have the authority to stop distribution of copies that have been physically stolen or otherwise leaked before they are completed an published. Without this, I think it would be legal to publish someones private letters or photos without permission, and that wouldn’t be cool.

Why does it matter? I have a vision that my children will be able to access a wikipedia-like database of all culture that has been produced in human history, with high technical quality and instant access. It’s much too hard to find works of culture these days, at least works that are a few years old. If you have access to a warez top-site you might be able to get anything you want, but it’s only for a small elite.

Why are we locking away old culture that no longer makes money for anyone? The works that do make money long after they were created are the ones that were very popular to begin with and don’t need a long copyright term. Some people want to make piles of money from The Beatles even though half of The Bealtes are already dead! I want everyone to be able to hear The Beatles at will. Copyright is not given by nature, it’s a political tool and we should use it as we see fit to get the results we want. This is the information age, and with the proper legal framework in place we could reach the point where quality culture is a commons, not something for economic and technical elites.